The abortion industry is so panic stricken due to losing control of their fanciful world of euphemisms they have to resort to lying about us. This is nothing new. Just about every one of our peaceful groups across the world has experienced the same repetitive onslaught of disingenuous hysteria.
If BPAS thought we were harassing women why did they not report it to the police? Surely they have a duty to protect their customers?
The reason is that they aren’t really interested in women’s welfare (obviously as they are prepared to rip the poor woman’s child from her womb) They are concerned because every woman we turn away from their door loses them another £680.
Seeing as we record our displays we say, 'bring it on.'
Here are some of the common complaints and their refutations:
“You are intimidating women!”
How? We aren’t shouting at them or encircling them. That only leaves the pictures. If the pictures are intimidating it is because of what the pictures portray that makes them intimidating.
“Don’t you think it’s hard enough for a woman going in to the clinic without you being here?”
Why is it hard with us being there? All we are doing is showing what these women supposedly already know. If abortion is just removing foetal tissue then why would the pictures make it harder?
“The pictures are horrific, you are *”£$*&^ sick for showing them!”
The pictures are sick because what they portray is sick. We aren’t the ones killing the babies in the pictures, the abortionists are.
If people can look at the pictures and want to attack us that is the sure sign of a selfish narcissistic culture. When we look at pictures of the Holocaust, do we get angry at the teacher or the ones who committed the atrocity?
Even abortion supporter Naomi Wolf said:
The pro-choice movement often treats with contempt the pro-lifers’ practice of holding up to our faces their disturbing graphics....[But] how can we charge that it is vile and repulsive for pro-lifers to brandish vile and repulsive images if the images are real? To insist that truth is in poor taste is the very height of hypocrisy. Besides, if these images are often the facts of the matter, and if we then claim that it is offensive for pro-choice women to be confronted by them, then we are making a judgment that women are too inherently weak to face a truth about which they have to make a grave decision. This view is unworthy of feminism.
“You’re all a bunch of @!$%*$[^”
We don’t care what you think about us. We care what you think about abortion and, the angrier you are now, the harder it will be for you to get the reality of abortion out of your head. If you have a functioning conscience and possess a level of intellectual honesty then you will eventually reason that you are right to be angry but you are just angry at the wrong people.
“These organisations are professional health care givers!”
Goodness knows what happens to the human heart to allow it to become so hardened to perform abortions and think that it is care giving.
On top of that it is totally false that these are organisations that the rest of the health care profession should be proud to be asscociated with.
Here are a few examples
BPAS involved in helping women obtain illegal abortions
Marie Stopes employee nearly kills a patient
http://www.ealingtoday.co.uk/default.asp?section=info&page=eaabortion001.htm
"You are using US tactics"
The UK abortion industry works with the US abortion industry all the time. If they kill babies like the Americans we will expose them like the Americans. Besides this strategy is actually British rather than American. Thomas Clarkson and William Wilberforce popularised the use of imagery in Social Reform well over 200 years ago.
All these complaints are just an attempt to try and change the subject. Abort67 is reframing the debate from the worn out "My body! My choice!" to what that choice looks like and just whose body is involved.
THREE BABIES SAVED IN 5.5 HOURS
BPAS aren't too happy with us. We are happy with that. Three women who were booked in for abortions this week saw the images of what abortion did to unborn children and decided they didn't want to do that to theirs. BPAS states that women already know the truth about abortion and they don't need to see these images. Their argument isn't with us it is with the women that tell us they feel they were lied to.
Please join us at this World changing conference. For more details go to http://chooselifecampaign.org/#1.
Come and hear how we can put an end to abortion in the UK from Abort67, Gregg Cunningham (founder of Center For Bio-Ethical Reform, Youth Defence, Precious Life, 40 Days for Life and Fundacjo Pro.
This will mark the beginning of a new era in pro-life activity, seeing a new generation of pro-lifers who are sick of the status quo and are eager for change. For over 40 years we have seen defeat in almost every challenge. Are you satisfied with that? If not, come and be encouraged and activated to bring an end to the culture of death. Follow the link and register for this free event.
Abort67 arrested in Brighton for the third time.
Andy Stephenson and Kathryn Sloane were arrested on the 22 June for peacefully showing the reality of abortion outside BPAS run Wistons abortion clinic in Brighton.
Due to complaints by members of the public the police forced the banners from the hands of the pair and arrested them both under the one size fits all Section 5 of the Public Order Act. Stephenson and Sloane said they are prepared to fight for Free Speech to the furthest extent.
"We have a great legal team and are partnering with Christian Concern who have much experience in fighting injustice and oppression of civil liberties. We very much respect the police but we believe they are misusing an already bad law. Their duty should be first to protect the most foundational elements of a democratic society." Stephenson said.
He added: "Members of the public who complain to the police because they are 'offended' over a message they don't like are culpable in encouraging an environment hostile to Free Speech. Perhaps they would feel more comfortable living in North Korea than supposedly the most liberal city in the UK."
The pair are due to return for re-bail on the 10th of July 2011.
Pro Choice!?! The lie of the pro abortion lobby
Pro abortion groups and individuals have cleverly deceived society by saying that they are pro choice. Pro choice about what? They are only pro choice if that choice is killing a human being. Listen to them howling about girls in schools being given teaching on abstinence. Their ranting is akin to the ad hominem attacks of the playground, but this isn't surprising when the facts are always stacked against them.
We stand outside abortion clinics offering help to women who are considering abortions and we regularly see young girls being dragged in to the clinic by parents or boyfriends. We hear women say "I have no choice but to abort, I don't want to but I can't see any way out!" How can Abortion Rights, BPAS and Marie Stopes claim to be there for the best interest of the woman? How can they say they are pro-choice when all they offer is killing the sons and daughters of these vulnerable people?
Abortion Rights are determined for your children to be sexually active and then encourage them to kill your grandchildren. Abort67 is on your case Abortion Rights. You have deceived the UK for too long and we will be revealing the ugly truth you are so desperate to hide.
Abort67's largest abortion display. Follow the link to see more picture's from the first display at Speaker's Corner, Hyde Park. We will add the volunteer's reports in the next couple of weeks as well as some film from the day that London saw abortion.
Here are a couple of testimonies from volunteers:
Joe:
...I spoke to a guy who said he’d never developed an opinion on abortion because he knew it was legal so just accepted it without giving it much thought. When he saw the pictures and I asked him what he thought he just said, ‘Well this is wrong, that is obviously a person. I’d never thought about it really because it’s legal and it seems fair that women should do what they like with their own bodies but that is clearly wrong.’ We talked about the amount that are happening daily and how late on in a pregnancy it can be done etc. Then later in the conversation he said, I think I can understand it when a woman’s been raped or something. I pointed out that 98% of abortions have nothing to do with rape or medical complications but before I could say anymore he said, ‘But then it doesn’t make any difference to the baby does it? It’s not their fault.’
Maria:
...There was one young man who remarked after looking at the pictures," I never knew this about abortion, it has really changed my view." I was so impressed by the work that you and your team are doing. I think that the use of these pictures will really help to change people’s views and move the Pro-Life issue forward. I very much look forward to working with you and the crew again soon.
Becky:
...One lady stopped and was astounded at the pictures of the baby in the womb before the abortion. She said, does it really have eyes like that? and I never knew it looked like that. She couldn't take her eyes off the images. Then she said she's had 5 abortions. I said did anyone tell you that’s what the baby looked like and she said no. I gave her one of the cards with the number to phone if you've had an abortion.
Victory for Free Speech and common sense!
We have just heard from the police that CPS have decided to take no further action against Kathryn and Andy over the arrests earlier in the year. Both were arrested for peacefully showing what it is that abortion does to the
unborn child. "This is very significant for the pro-life movement in seeking to change the way the nation thinks about abortion. We will continue to expose the killing that goes on in these "clinics". We will continue to bring to light what the abortion industry is determined to hide from these desperate women. We will continue to support alternatives and REAL choices for those in crisis pregnancy" said Andy.
Gregg Cunningham the Executive Director of Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform said "Injustice that is hidden will invariably be tolerated. Injustice that is exposed will invariably become intolerable"
Please help us in making abortion harder to live with. We would like to thank those who have supported us, particularly the Christian Legal Centre.
Ann Furedi hides the truth on Woman's hour regarding abort67
We have just listened to Ann Furedi dodge the issue on Woman's hour, BBC radio 4. She started off as misrepresenting our displays by describing us as intimidating women and photographing them entering the clinic. It is no surprise that someone who makes a living from killing unborn children would be prepared to lie about those trying to stop them.
We never photograph anyone entering the clinic or around the clinic. We document everything we do with security cameras because of the inevitable lies that will be conjured up about our behaviour.
We have only ever been stopped by the police for SHOWING WHAT IT IS THAT BPAS DO. Ann fails to see the irony in that. The police have often commented on how polite we are and that they have no problem with our behaviour.
Naomi Wolf, an outspoken pro-abortion campaigner said:
The pro-choice movement often treats with contempt the pro-lifers’ practice of holding up to our faces their disturbing graphics. . . .How can we charge that it is vile and repulsive for pro-lifers to brandish vile and repulsive images if the images are real? To insist that the truth is in poor taste is the very height of hypocrisy. Besides, if these images are often the facts of the matter, and if we then claim that it is offensive for pro-choice women to be confronted by them, then we are making the judgement that women are too inherently weak to face a truth about which they have to make a grave decision. This view of women is unworthy of feminism.
Naomi Wolf, “Our Bodies, Our Souls,” New Republic, 16 October 1996.
Of course Ann Furedi doesn't want the pictures outside her clinics. The pictures force abortion advocates to defend killing children rather than defending "Choice."
Spot the difference - Setting an example other nations would be proud of
Two volunteers arrested for peacefully educating about abortion
On the 10th of August two volunteers were arrested for showing what abortion does to an unborn child outside Wistons abortion clinic in Chatsworth Road, Brighton.
The police acted on complaints from people who said they were offended, arresting two of the team holding a large banner showing an early abortion. This is the second time we have been arrested just for educating about who the unborn child is and what abortion does to him or her. The only thing the police objected to was the banners. The behaviour and language of the volunteers was never brought into question.
Whilst we respect the police, we detest the bad and ambiguous laws that make Britain a dangerous place to express your views. Who needs freedom of expression when the only view allowed is that which toes the party line?
It is equally worrying that as a nation we have become dependent upon the government and the police to look after us. If there is something we don't like, instead of acting with maturity and engaging in dialogue we look to our "Care-takers" to take away whatever distracts from us thinking about the more important things in life like who will win X-Factor.
If Abortion is so bad that we can't bear to see it then why do we tolerate it?
To be continued...
Ann Furedi admits she's wasting her time
The Daily Mail reports that Marie Stopes staff are able to procure free abortions alongside other benefits. British Pregnancy Advisory Service's chief executive Ann Furedi commented:
‘Unplanned pregnancy can happen to anyone, even those working in abortion services.’
Marie Stopes Ad
The day Marie Stopes International were planning to advertise their deadly services on Channel 4 we took four of our banners outside their Brixton clinic. We had asked them if they wanted our help in advertising their services as they had announced on their website that:
We believe that every woman has the right to accurate, unbiased information about all of her pregnancy choices, including abortion.
After telling us they would get their marketing department to contact us we heard no more from them. We can only assume they were too busy to get in contact so we went ahead anyway.
We were told over and over again by women who had experienced abortions that they were totally unaware and uninformed that abortion did what it did. After seeing our pictures they all agreed they would not have gone through with it. Wait a minute, perhaps that's why Marie Stopes never got back to us. Marie Stopes doesn't care about women's choices, only in promoting abortion.
Oops
What do you do if you don't like the answer to your question? Well if you are part of Marie Stopes, you stick your head in the sand and change the subject. Recently, Marie Stopes ran a poll to demonstrate the support for legalised abortion in Northern Ireland.
As the results were clearly showing that they were struggling to find this support we emailed Marie Stopes for a comment and of course we heard nothing. Bernadette Smyth from Precious Life, an anti abortion group in Northern Ireland managed to take them up on this.
On Tuesday 9th March, Director of Precious Life Bernadette Smyth went head to head with an agent of Marie Stopes on an Irish radio station. Bernadette let the Marie Stopes agent dig her own trap by allowing her to say their first poll result “..had to be taken seriously”; “..the government had to act on it”; “..87% of people couldn’t be ignored”; …etc, etc. But then Bernadette sprung the trap by asking “What about the 82% of people who are currently voting on your website poll saying NO, abortion should not be legalised in Ireland?” The hypocrisy of Marie Stopes was exposed live on air when their agent said that poll result could not be taken seriously. Bernadette retorted “Then why are you taking your first poll results seriously? Why are Marie Stopes not issuing press releases stating that that 82% of Irish people don’t want abortion legalised? Do Marie Stopes only issue poll results when it suits them?” The Marie Stopes agent was totally lost for words.
By the time Marie Stopes realised what was happening and pulled the plug on the on-line poll the "NO" vote had reached 94%. When we tried to find the poll on their website the page came back saying "OOPS - You have arrived at this page in error; it may be that the page you are looking for has been moved during recent improvements to our website." Oops indeed!
This isn't the first time Marie Stopes have struggled to gather support for killing unborn children. In 2007 they ran a petition for a year but only managed to get 498 signatures. 77 of which were Marie Stopes staff, 14 from IPAS and 3 from Abortion Rights.
Will Marie Stopes stop pushing their unwanted and deadly trade on the world? I doubt it. Not until there is enough resistance to what they are doing. Will you join us in standing against them?
